Re: Permitting non-indirect links (3 CCs removed)
David Durand wrote:
> Terry's post indicated that behavior was only defined for HTTP fragment
specifiers, but the above contradicts it. I guess I'll have to read the
latest version, but if anyone can save me the misery, I'd appreciate it.
That was my excerpt from RFC 1630. In the followup I quoted (as
I should have done originally) from the latest URL syntax draft,
which generalizes the prohibition against returning only the
#fragment to all URLs (pointlessly, in my view, but so what).