Re: Can we be more concrete?
Subject: Re: Can we be more concrete?
From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 14:55:16 -0900
From email@example.com Mon Dec 30 16: 57:12 1996
X-Hobby: low-tide clam sexing
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
At 02:56 PM 12/30/96 -0600, len bullard wrote:
>W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you mean. I thought use of URLs (and therefore support
>> for their resolution) was a hard requirement for XML.
>It is, I believe. It comes under "gotta live with what is working".
>Can't say I like the #hack. How does this fit with the concept of
>separately storing queries so that they can be reused by multiple
>links in multiple documents? I want to point to a query multiple times
>much like a function is prototyped, then called whereever needed.
Assuming that XML provides/supports/requires indirect addressing, then you
should be able to use the #name syntax to address a location address that
is a query, e.g.:
Basset hounds</crossref> are slobber monsters.
<!-- queries.xml: -->
<!DOCTYPE Queries SYSTEM "queries.dtd" >
W. Eliot Kimber (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Senior SGML Consulting Engineer, Highland Consulting
2200 North Lamar Street, Suite 230, Dallas, Texas 75202
+1-214-953-0004 +1-214-953-3152 fax
http://www.isogen.com (work) http://www.drmacro.com (home)
"Rats in the morning, rats in the afternoon...if they don't go away, I'll be
re-educated soon..." --Austin Lounge Lizards, "1984 Blues"