Re: Anchor terminology
Subject: Re: Anchor terminology
From: email@example.com (David G. Durand)
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 17:06:28 -0500
From firstname.lastname@example.org Thu Dec 26 16: 59:58 1996
At 10:15 AM 12/26/96, Jon Bosak wrote:
>| I agree fully that it is high time we reclaimed some of the remoter
>| linguistic vagrancies of HyTime, and that we need to do so in a
>| language understanded of the people. My problem is that users tend to
>| think of links in terms of direction, whether or not any
>| directionality is implied: so "link end" still retains connotations of
>| "target" and anchor retains connotations of "source".
>Well, connotation is in the mind of the beholder, I guess. "Anchor"
>started out with a directional connotation (although I think with some
>historical investigation you might find some people who thought that
>"anchor" meant "source" rather than "target"), but the vernacular
>usage fostered by HTML calls both ends "anchors". <A HREF> is on one
>end and <A NAME> is on the other, and they are both <A> (anchor)
I would also note that the senses of the terms you use have been in use
since the 60's in the Hypertext research community. And, of course,
multi-ended links are frequently non-directional, so that the confusion (if
it occurs), ill be unlikely to persist.
I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
David Durand email@example.com \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams
MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________