RE: ERB discussion of public identifiers
>From: Tim Bray[SMTP:firstname.lastname@example.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 1996 15:05
>Subject: ERB discussion of public identifiers
>I suspect that if a binding vote were taken today, the ERB would either
>(a) reinstate the PUBLIC keyword, and put in a nonexclusive
> for Socat support, or
>(b) refuse to put PUBLIC in until there was agreement on a required
> resolution mechanism.
Personally, (a) would satisfy me.
To mitigate implementers' concerns about how complex "Socat support"
might be, the straw-man proposal posted 1996-12-02 describes (I hope) a
syntax compatible with the complete SGML Open Catalog definition, with
only the single keyword "PUBLIC" supported. This would allow
implementers to work with a supplied Socat without modification,
ignoring any specification of function other than the basic PUBLIC
indirection. Implementers could then choose to support more than the
basic functionality at their leisure ... there would be no fear of
complexity that might be there if XML just "pointed" to the Socat spec.
G. Ken Holman Tel: +1 613 596-2233
Chief Technology Officer Fax: +1 613 596-5934
Microstar Software Ltd. WATS: 1 800 267-9975
3775 Richmond Road Mail: email@example.com
Nepean Ontario Info: firstname.lastname@example.org
CANADA K2H-5B7 Web: http://www.microstar.com
1605 Mardick Court, Box 266 Phone: +1 613 489-2987
Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 E-mail: gkholman@CanadaMail.com
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----