Re: FPI's in NOTATION declarations
At 02:05 PM 11/29/96 -0500, David G. Durand wrote:
>add a new suggestion, that by allowing a _list_ of URIs in the SYSTEM ID,
>we can have all the advantages of PUBLIC, without the drawback of the new
>syntax. (I don't know what this drawback is, but some people obviously feel
>that there is one).]
I think that the idea of allowing multiple URIs in a reference is a good
one. It provides a fallback for network failure.
But I also think that we should keep the SGML public identifier syntax that
hundreds of products and systems already support.