[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: FPI's in NOTATION declarations



At 02:05 PM 11/29/96 -0500, David G. Durand wrote:
>I
>add a new suggestion, that by allowing a _list_ of URIs in the SYSTEM ID,
>we can have all the advantages of PUBLIC, without the drawback of the new
>syntax. (I don't know what this drawback is, but some people obviously feel
>that there is one).]

I think that the idea of allowing multiple URIs in a reference is a good
one. It provides a fallback for network failure.

But I also think that we should keep the SGML public identifier syntax that
hundreds of products and systems already support.

 Paul Prescod


Follow-Ups: