Re: Pro-FPI manifesto. (Actually a one-character correction to get FPIs for free)
At 5:01 PM 11/26/96, Terry Allen wrote:
>That was my idea too, but it would encompass URCs, and I'm not
>sure that we want to get into resolution by URCs (bags-o-metadata).
>One might better point to a URC by an URL or URN.
I agree about URCs being fishy... still, we're only on the hook if someone
thinks they've solved the URC problem (which is a small worry for the near
>URNs would be PUBLIC, not SYSTEM, I would think.
Well, they ought to be, but my point was that the sentiment against PUBLIC
could carry the day and we will still be alright (assuming that the URN:
prefix goes through). I mean from an SGML point of view URNs are SYSTEM
(because they're not native to SGML itself). I tend to agree that encoding
FPIs as URNs in a SYSTEM identifier is kinda weird, but then the whole web
is kinda weird...
> Terry Allen Fujitsu Software Corp. email@example.com
>"In going on with these experiments, how many pretty systems do we build,
> which we soon find outselves obliged to destroy?" - Benjamin Franklin
> A Davenport Group Sponsor: http://www.ora.com/davenport/index.html
David Durand firstname.lastname@example.org \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams
MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________