Re: CSS vs. DSSSL-O
Jon Bosak wrote:
> [Len Bullard:]
> | It would seem the first issue would be if designing
> | XML requires one to also design styles and hyperlinks.
> | For SGML, those are separate issues traditionally.
> | Why in XML are they not?
> You cannot have a high-end delivery vehicle for the Web unless you have
> 1. Structure
> 2. Hyperlinking
> 3. Presentational semantics.
Not at issue. Structure has been resolved with some issues
remaining that need a Technical Corrigendum for SGML.
Hyperlinking is to be discussed next and the presentational
semantics are the last item. Ok so far?
> These have been our three explicit deliverables since we started this
> Please read the activity statement.
I have read the activity statement. Why is that an obstacle to
a reasonable discussion of the questions I am raising?