Re: XML Spec Draft of Nov. 14th; versions at Textuality

>For what it's worth, Michael and I are agreed, but the ERB hasn't
>yet considered the question, that the huge list
>of 10646 character roles should migrate into an appendix, with
>a pointer in the main text.  Aside from being hideously ugly,
>it breaks up the flow [and also, things that are in the 
>appendix don't count against XML's 20-page budget.]  Does
>anyone have a reason not to do this? - Tim

Good idea. I think that in general, the names of the major
character classes is enough.