Re: XML, HTML, SGML, life, the universe, and everything
W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
> I think what needs to be done is to define a grove plan for XML. Given
> such a grove plan, it is then meaningful to say something like "using the
> XML grove plan, an XML document parsed by an SGML parser shall produce a
> grove identical to the grove produced by an XML grove construction process
> using the same grove plan."
> This would certainly provide a more precise definition than "ESIS".
This is emminently sensible. Accepting the grove concept would
make the other pieces we need to consider easier to specify as well.
has been a weakly defined concept for some time and has not given us the
required precision in many cases. That is why we have heard the term
"beyondESIS" or "superESIS" too often. I think this also establishes
a precedent that will serve the W3C members well in other applications
and language work if adopted.
What are the objections?