Re: B.1 and B.2 results
On Fri, 25 Oct 1996 00:04:30 -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org (Gavin Nicol) wrote:
>>The parser sees *everything* in the entity, but several entities can
>>be stored in a single storage object. The storage object can contain
>>things that aren't in any SGML entities.
>>None of this is new; FSIs are just a new formalism for something
>>we've always had. See notes 1 and 2 in clause 6.1 of ISO
>Thank you Charles. This is a good clarification and is the way I
>understand things (the best kind of clarification is one that agrees
>with your position ;-)).
>I should note that a *further* reason for both FSI's and MIME-based
>storage managers is that email will potentially be an important
>delivery mechanism for XML. Both FSI's and MIME are perfectly suited
Well, while I'm on a role, let me clarify things a bit further. MIME is a
storage manager. FSIs are a means of identifying storage managers in an entity
declaration. So the two work together; they are not alternatives.
(Actually, the SGML Extended Facilities list two MIME-based storage managers:
MIME is a "container" storage manager, like TAR, and is used for normal entity
declarations. MIMETYPE is used to associate notations with processing, and
occurs only in external identifiers in notation declarations.)
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management