- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 1996 03:36:45 GMT
- To: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
- Cc: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 12 Oct 96 15:09:33 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen
<U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU> wrote:
>On 16 October 1996, the ERB will vote to decide the following question.
>A straw poll indicates the question needs further discussion in the work
>group.
>
>B.10 What form should EMPTY elements take, if there are EMPTY elements
>in XML: <e>, <e/, or <e></e> (where '/' is assumed the NET string)
>(7.3, 11.2.3)?
>
<e></e> requires no changes to the SGML declaration. The DTD will need to
contain (have I got this right, Michael) an "elephant's child" content model
instead of the declared content EMPTY, but that won't break any SGML tools at
all.
--
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management
--
Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 23:36:33 UTC