[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: C.4 Undeclared entities?



On Tue, 22 Oct 96 08:25:14 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
wrote:

>[Medium-long note.  Executive summary:  the discussion of 'implicit'
>DTDs has served its purpose and can be ended without damage to
>the process of designing and documenting XML 1.0.]

O.K. It is now clear that in XML a document "without a DTD" means literally
that, and not just "parsable without reference to  its DTD". I think this is
unfortunate because I believe it will render XML a non-starter in the
marketplace.

I hope someone can prove me wrong by rebutting the following proposition (formal
mathematical proof not required):

XML without a DTD is no different from HTML extended by the ability to "add tags
and attributes" just by defining processing for the additions in a style sheet
(cascading or otherwise).
--
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
           13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
  International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
 Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management
--


References: