Re: Optional features considered harmful
At 06:54 AM 10/24/96 +0000, Tim Bray wrote:
>At 11:34 AM 24/10/96 +0000, James Clark wrote:
>>At 23:57 23/10/96 +0000, Tim Bray wrote:
>James is correct; it is certainly possible to do this. But SGML provides
>a built-in, standard, nonproprietary way to go about it. The way I sell
>SGML in the corporate world is:
>SGML gives you:
> 1. a way to model the structure of your documents, and
> 2. a way to control the authoring so they come out right, and
> 3. a way to modularize documents for re-use and management, and
> 4. ALL OF THIS IS STANDARDIZED AND NON-PROPRIETARY
But note that general text entities *don't actually do point 3*. General
text entities *ARE NOT REUSABLE*. In fact, the only way to have re-usable
SGML documents, as James has pointed out, is to make them documents
syntactically (even if the objects may be semantically subparts of documents).
While external text entities are a useful convenience for single-person
authoring, they are not useful as a general mechanism for managing SGML
data as re-usable objects.
W. Eliot Kimber (email@example.com)
Senior SGML Consultant and HyTime Specialist
Passage Systems, Inc., (512)339-1400
10596 N. Tantau Ave., Cupertino, CA 95014-3535 (408) 366-0300, (408)
2608 Pinewood Terrace, Austin, TX 78757 (512) 339-1400 (fone/fax)
http://www.passage.com (work) http://www.drmacro.com (home)
"If I never had existed, would you still remember me?..."
--Austin Lounge Lizards, "1984 Blues"