Re: SDATA entities
>to 10646. Thus I belive that it is higlhly important that XML
>includes SDATA entities and in a way that is decoupled from 10646.
>Use of "private use" areas in 10646 I believe will lead to the same
>mess as eg IBM ended up with EBCDIC.
>At the recent SGML Asia Pacific conference it was very interesting to
>hear the complaints from "CJK" representatives on 10646.
If you feel it is negative now, imagine a few years ago. At least now
I get a more positive feeling from Japanese factions that were rabidly
against it a few years ago.