Re: Caveat Tag Salad (Was: some ERB decisions)
At 7:04 PM 10/20/96, Arjun Ray wrote:
>Not necessarily, or rather, this is *not* an argument for OMITTAG. It's
>actually a new kind of minimization (isn't SHORTTAG up for review
>anyway?:-)), i.e. a named endtag is shorthand for all, er, contextually
>required endtags and "expands" to the necessary number of anonymous endtags.
>With this rule, error recovery doesn't apply at all!
We old lisp hackers knew these as "super-parens". They never caught on, though.
I don't feel strongly about this, though you have some good points. The
major problem with empty end-tags is that they change people's habits from
HTML, which is not a big win. It also makes implementing Emacs modes
slightly less simple, I think.
I must say that after experience with SGML minimization, even this small
convenience makes me nervous. Given the nerves and the difference from
existing practice, I have to throw in a _no_ vote on empty end tags.
Anyway tag salad can be very satisfying if the chef is good!
RE delenda est.
I am not a number. I am an undefined character.
David Durand firstname.lastname@example.org \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com
Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst
http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams
MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________