RE: some ERB decisions REF: A.20 Comments
I could not tell from the post if that which is said about A.20 is a
consensus decision or an unresolved issue.
>From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen[SMTP:U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU]
>Sent: Thursday, October 17, 1996 12:01
>To: W3C SGML Working Group
>Subject: some ERB decisions
>The SGML ERB met Wed. Oct 16th and voted on several items already
>submitted to the SGML WG. Participating: Bosak, Bray, Clark, Maler,
>Paoli, Sperberg-McQueen, and Sharpe. Absent: DeRose, Hollander,
>Magliery, and Connolly. All decisions were by consensus of all those
>participating in the call, and thus carry a majority of the membership
>of the ERB.
>Several issues were left unresolved at the end of the meeting; the ERB
>will be meeting today and Saturday to discuss them further and resolve
> A.20 XML will retain the notion and syntax of comments (= 8879's
> 'comment declarations') (7.6, 10.3), but comment declarations
> will contain at most one comment: comments will take the form
> '<!>' or else will begin with '<!--' and end with '-->' (no
> space allowed), and may not contain '--'.
>Comments will take the form '<!--' ... '-->', no internal '--' is
>and no white space between the final '--' and the final '>'.
>Empty comments (<!>) will not be allowed in XML.
If this issue is still open as unresolved, I find that the empty comment
is very useful and I feel that it should be retained.
G. Ken Holman Tel: +1 613 596-CADE(2233) /\ /\
Chief Technology Officer Fax: +1 613 596-5934 \/ \/ Computer
Microstar Software Ltd. WATS: 1 800 267-9975 /\ /\ Aided
3775 Richmond Road Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org \/ \/ Document
Nepean Ontario Info: email@example.com /\ /\
CANADA K2H-5B7 Web: http://www.microstar.com \/ \/
G. Ken Holman Phone: +1 613 489-2987
P.O. Box 266 Street: 1605 Mardick Court
CANADA KOA-2E0 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----