Re: B.9 Formal system, public identifiers?
At 16:27 15/10/96 -0400, David Durand wrote:
> If we specify FSI syntax, and
>then restrict the FSIs to be URLs, there is a nice path to more-robust
>identifiers at no more cost than we incur by implementing URLs to
There is a cost to the user: instead of entering a kind of thing they are
familiar with, namely a URL, they have to enter something that they are not
familiar with, namely an FSI.
If we stick to URLs now, we can still support FSIs in the future: any FSI
must include < and > but these two characters are not allowed in URLs. It's
ridiculous to force users to type <url> at the beginning of all their URLs
when it's completely unnecessary to do so.
> But making it impossible to ever do the right thing and use
>location independent naming seems a high price to bear.
URL syntax is extensible: why can't it be used to do location-independent
naming? Something like fpi://W3C/DTD/HTML_3.2 is a perfectly good URL. I
can't resolve it, but then I can't resolve FPIs either.
Location-independent naming is not a problem specific to XML. We should use
whatever general solution gets adopted for the WWW, rather than trying to
come up with a solution specifically for XML.