- From: Charles F. Goldfarb <Charles@SGMLsource.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 07:50:04 GMT
- To: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU>
- Cc: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, 12 Oct 96 15:10:12 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen
<U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU> wrote:
>On 16 October 1996, the ERB will vote to decide the following question.
>A straw poll indicates the question needs further discussion in the work
>group.
>
>B.12 Should XML retain SGML's prohibition on multiple declarations for
>the same notation (11.4)?
I thought the ERB had decided not to augment SGML. Why is this question even
being asked?
--
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management
--
Received on Sunday, 13 October 1996 03:51:54 UTC