Re: RS/RE: basic questions
On Wed, 2 Oct 96 22:44:32 EDT, email@example.com wrote:
>There's no point in practice in being compatible with 8879 -- instead, XML
>has to be compatible with actual tools.
Hey, it worked for HTML, didn't it? And think of all the time we could save not
having to write and review standards -- XML and SGML.
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management