Re: RS/RE: basic questions
At 02:36 PM 10/2/96 -0700, Joe English wrote:
>This is not the *only* solution. Another is to
>forbid whitespace in element content. Yes!
>is to require that pseudoelements which contain
>nothing but whitespace be "escaped" with entity
I suggested this, but I am not convinced it is "understandable" enough.
>Still another (which nobody's mentioned
>yet for some reason :-) is to forbid *element* content,
>so that all whitespace becomes significant.
Lee Quin suggested that.
>The question is which of these options is the least
>unpalatable. Personally, I find a solution that lets
>me author in SGML and run instances through a simple
>normalizer to be far more palatable than one that
>requires me to add black magic to my SGML declaration
>and all of my DTDs before I can publish XML.
So you are supporting _which_ proposal?