Re: Combine RE/RS proposals?
On Tue, 1 Oct 1996 15:34:49 -0400, "David G. Durand" <firstname.lastname@example.org> (David G.
>The list in the following may help to clarify things..
>At 11:20 PM 9/30/96, Charles F. Goldfarb wrote:
>>At that point it might be best to bite the rest of the bullet and always
>>data. Look at the advantages:
>>1. No need to access a DTD to determine if an element is mixed content.
>>2. All REs and RSs are ignored -- full stop! (See, I'm internationalized :-)
>>3. Really easy parsing.
>>4. Much simpler to explain.
100% compatible with 8879.
>Or, by contrast:
>It might be best to bite the rest of the bullet and never delimit
>data. Look at the advantages:
>1. No need to access a DTD to determine if an element is mixed content.
>2. No REs, RSs, or other whitespace are ignored.
>3. Really easy parsing.
>4. Much simpler to explain.
>5. No quotes to get wrong -- ever.
Incompatible with 8879.
Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553
13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA
International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime
Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management