Re: Element content the real issue?...
Paul Prescod <email@example.com> wrote:
> David G. Durand" wrote:
> >[...] for XML, we have a problem with any kind of space
> >elimination in element content when used with DTD-less processing. It's
> >easy to use my approach with SGML, but with XML, there is a real problem
> >because without a DTD, we can't tell the difference between element content
> >and other content.
> According to the proposal:
> 1. All white space, including RS and RE, immediately following start tags and
> immediately preceding end tags is not significant.
> > So, contra your claim, and my previous assumptions, RE handling is not
> >the key issue here. Whatever we decide on RE processing we will still have
> >to deal with element content in a nasty way because of other whitespace
> >being treated as data.
> I believe that the proposal handles this in an SGML-compatible way.
What about (where '@' denotes an RE and '.' denotes a space):
The RE and space characters preceding the CCC element
are not deemed insignificant by rule 1, whereas an
SGML parser would treat them as such if AAA had