Re: Current Status of Discussion on RE/RS Handling
At 17:18 27/09/96 -0400, Gavin Nicol wrote:
>>If the rules about ignoring white-space are left to the XML application and
>>the application is free to require that those rules are not applied for
>>verbatim elements, then XML tools built on top of SGML parsers will be
>>unable to correctly process some XML documents, namely those that have
>>verbatim elements that include REs that are ignored according to the SGML
>This is only true if the record ends occur in the input. If a suitable
>declaration is given (ie, one in which RE and RE never occur) then an
>SGML parser and an XML parser should return identical parse results.
I explained in an earlier message
(mainly paragraph 2) why I believe that view to be mistaken.