[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: RS/RE

>Taking this one stage further, having agreed to use ISO 10646 coding we
>should, therefore, be consistent and use the ISO 6429 control codes
>referenced in 10646. These define a Record Separator as Hex 1E, and a Unit
>Separator as Hex 1F. Would these do as replacement values for RE/RS?

I would prefer setting them to character codes that would never occur, or
perhaps assigning RE to 0x04 (EOT) and RS to 0x01 (SOH).

If forget, but aren't there a couple of coded in UNICODE that are
guaranteed to never occur?
Follow-Ups: References: