W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > May 1997

Re: Conformance + an apology

From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 21:35:51 -0500
Message-ID: <338B9A07.7AB3@hiwaay.net>
To: Digitome Ltd <digitome@iol.ie>
CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Digitome Ltd wrote:

> Is it not strange that something as fundamental as the correctness
> of XML parse trees is not part of the base spec?

yep.  is the bnf the formal definition of the language?

However,  I would like to hear what the technical 
leader of the XML ERB, James Clark, has to say on the 
conformance of XML parse trees.  

Received on Tuesday, 27 May 1997 22:36:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:26 UTC