W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > May 1997

Re: Conformance + an apology

From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 21:35:51 -0500
Message-ID: <338B9A07.7AB3@hiwaay.net>
To: Digitome Ltd <digitome@iol.ie>
CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org

Digitome Ltd wrote:
> 

> Is it not strange that something as fundamental as the correctness
> of XML parse trees is not part of the base spec?

yep.  is the bnf the formal definition of the language?

However,  I would like to hear what the technical 
leader of the XML ERB, James Clark, has to say on the 
conformance of XML parse trees.  

len

Received on Tuesday, 27 May 1997 22:36:10 EDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Digitome Ltd.: "Re: Conformance"
Previous message: Murata Makoto: "Comments on Part 1: Asian characters"
In reply to: Digitome Ltd: "Re: Conformance + an apology"
Next in thread: Tim Bray: "Re: Conformance + an apology"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:35 EDT