W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > June 1997

Re: Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]

From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 19:19:42 -0500
Message-ID: <33B0641E.5B89@hiwaay.net>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
 
David G. Durand wrote:

> > > I still disagree with this. A normative reference turns 8879 into mandatory
> > > reading for implementors, and implies that _if_ there's a hole in the XML
> > > spec, then 8879 may automatically be invoked to clarify things

 len bullard wrote:

> > No.  It says where XML uses SGML as the intellectual basis of its
> > construction, it is legally obligated to maintain that inviolate.
> 
> Huh??????
> 
> You seem to be using the term "normative reference" in some
> way that I'm not familiar with. Please explain. The meaning
> of the term "normative reference" that I'm familiar has exactly
> the consequences that David points out.

Consequence arises from action not declaration.  
Otherwise, the word would be the thing.
 
> [If this is an old, worn out, tired out topic, then please
> reply off the list. I don't mean to beat a dead horse,
> but I do need to absorb more of the culture of this forum.]

It means the editors/designers/ERB of the specification have 
specified a language that does not violate the technical requirements of 
the parent specification.  It does not prevent them from 
writing one which is technically complete.  If they can do 
that, they can write a specification that needs no clarification.

A normative reference means XML is SGML, not SGML-like.

len
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 1997 20:20:05 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:04:44 EDT