At 10:53 AM 9/20/96 CDT, Michael Sperberg-McQueen wrote: >Can someone actually explain the RE rules here, in terms *not* those >used in the relevant clause of 8879? (If I understood it in those >terms I wouldn't have this problem.) Funny you should ask. Mere seconds before I got your email I was searching the Web for just such an explanation for my own use. I found one at: http://www.let.ruu.nl/departments/C+L/loeffen/archive/cts/a/1993/19930201.2 It's a Usenet thread that you participated in. =) Paul PrescodReceived on Friday, 20 September 1996 12:20:32 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:22 EDT