At 02:17 AM 9/20/96 GMT, Charles F. Goldfarb wrote: >It seems like the two Pauls are agreeing that I can only speak for me. =) >1. XML has to be easy for SGML editors (and word-processor add-ons) to generate >and for arbitrary browsers to read. Right. That's why I'm worried about this RS/RE correction proposal. I don't think today's SGML editors will support it. Otherwise, the proposal is quite elegant and simple. >We needn't worry about XML-only editors or >dedicated XML browsers because there won't be any. I would word this a little differently: "We can't _depend_ on XML-only editors or dedicated XML browsers because there MAY NOT be any." (especially in the short term) >2. The browsers need to be able to work without accessing a DTD. Exactly! Paul PrescodReceived on Friday, 20 September 1996 09:21:52 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:22 EDT