On Wed, 23 Oct 1996 02:28:53 -0500, Robert Streich <streich@slb.com> wrote: > >Although I very much want this behavior so that I don't have to explain >to people why they have to use 1s and 0s in CALS table markup, I think we >should defer it to a future version of XML once the SGML revision has >been completed. I agree with Robert -- multiple enumerations are desirable, but not worth breaking conformance for. Another option would be to use the General Architecture "Lextype" declaration, which is standardized: <!attlist elemtype1 att1 nmtokens #implied att2 nmtokens #implied lextype cdata #fixed "att1 YesOrNo att2 YesOrNo"> where "YesOrNo" is a lexical type name for which a model is defined in a separate "lexical definition document". -- Charles F. Goldfarb * Information Management Consulting * +1(408)867-5553 13075 Paramount Drive * Saratoga CA 95070 * USA International Standards Editor * ISO 8879 SGML * ISO/IEC 10744 HyTime Prentice-Hall Series Editor * CFG Series on Open Information Management --Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 23:36:37 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:36 EDT