- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 22:07:59 -0400
- To: U35395@UICVM.CC.UIC.EDU
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>>OK. I can live with this, but am not overly happy about the "must be >>optional" clause. > >Motivation is simple: if I want to ensure that document D is in a >form that all XML processors can parse, then I need a way, using the >processor in front of me, to check that. OK. I can accept that. Let's hope XML doesn't go the same way as PASCAL though...
Received on Thursday, 17 October 1996 22:09:37 UTC