At 04:49 AM 10/10/96 GMT, Charles F. Goldfarb wrote: >Actually, Tim, I was supporting your position. The keyword SDATA in the ISO >character entity set is unnecessary because the replacement text is a symbolic >string. (My original intention was that a system would use an equivalent entity >set in which the replacement text was real system data.) The [xxxxxx] replacement text "templates" have been widely implemented to produce the desired glyphs. But this doesn't mean they're not system data, does it? It's still essentially a "processing instruction that returns data" (clause 8). Regular internal text entities aren't supposed to have this property. EveReceived on Thursday, 10 October 1996 10:11:11 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:32 EDT