W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > November 1996


From: Len Bullard <cbullard@HiWAAY.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 07:42:01 -0600
Message-ID: <329AF3A9.6EE9@HiWAAY.net>
To: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
CC: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca, tbray@textuality.com, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Jon Bosak wrote:
> [Len Bullard:]
> | It would seem the first issue would be if designing
> | XML requires one to also design styles and hyperlinks.
> | For SGML, those are separate issues traditionally.
> | Why in XML are they not?
> You cannot have a high-end delivery vehicle for the Web unless you have
> 1. Structure
> 2. Hyperlinking
> 3. Presentational semantics.

Not at issue.  Structure has been resolved with some issues 
remaining that need a Technical Corrigendum for SGML.
Hyperlinking is to be discussed next and the presentational 
semantics are the last item.  Ok so far?

> These have been our three explicit deliverables since we started this
> activity.
> Please read the activity statement.

I have read the activity statement.  Why is that an obstacle to 
a reasonable discussion of the questions I am raising?

Received on Tuesday, 26 November 1996 08:41:51 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:43 EDT