Jon Bosak wrote: > > [Len Bullard:] > > | It would seem the first issue would be if designing > | XML requires one to also design styles and hyperlinks. > | For SGML, those are separate issues traditionally. > | Why in XML are they not? > > You cannot have a high-end delivery vehicle for the Web unless you have > > 1. Structure > > 2. Hyperlinking > > 3. Presentational semantics. Not at issue. Structure has been resolved with some issues remaining that need a Technical Corrigendum for SGML. Hyperlinking is to be discussed next and the presentational semantics are the last item. Ok so far? > These have been our three explicit deliverables since we started this > activity. > > Please read the activity statement. I have read the activity statement. Why is that an obstacle to a reasonable discussion of the questions I am raising? lenReceived on Tuesday, 26 November 1996 08:41:51 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:43 EDT