W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > November 1996


From: Kurt Conrad <conrad@SagebrushGroup.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 20:06:51 -0800
Message-ID: <01BBDB0C.335ACDA0@73.san-francisco-026.ca.dial-access.att.net>
To: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
Cc: "papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca" <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>, "tbray@textuality.com" <tbray@textuality.com>, "w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org" <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>

While reading Len's message, another thought came to mind.

A much stronger case could me made for DSSSL(-o) if a substancial portion of SGML vendors supported it in commercial products. User-defined markup languages (on the other hand) and even portions of HyTime have been supported in the open market for some time now.  This could easily make DSSSL seem much more risky to those driven by market forces than should otherwise be the case and create an obstacle where none needs to exist.

/s/ kwc 11/25/96 20:06
Received on Monday, 25 November 1996 23:09:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:25:20 UTC