Jon recently wrote: >The technical intricacies are over my head, but the procedural >situation is pretty simple: the ERB examined this subject in great >detail and came to the conclusion that the SDATA mechanism as it >stands in 8879 is not specified well enough to be usable and that we >are not the right group to provide an optimum replacement. Our plan >is to include SDATA on a list of items that we urgently wish ISO to >consider and to include it in XML when ISO has fixed it. I.e., in the revision, not in any earlier TC. (Personal opinion.) Dave Peterson SGMLWorks! davep@acm.orgReceived on Monday, 9 December 1996 17:49:19 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:03:47 EDT