W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2004

Re: RDF semantics explosion

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:32:42 +0000
Message-ID: <40067A5A.8070103@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org


I will not review this today. I hope to have time tomorrow morning.

Jeremy


Brian McBride wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> pat hayes wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>
>> There are two versions of it. This one
>>
>> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html#defDinterp
> 
> 
> Diff from PR version @ 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0052.html
> 
>>
>> is in my view the clearest exposition.  On the other hand
>>
>> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bc.html#defDinterp
> 
> 
> Diff from PR version @ 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/0053.html
> 
>>
>> makes the fewest changes to the PR text so may be preferable for 
>> logistical reasons. This only adds the extra vocabulary condition, 
>> nothing else.
>>
>> Apart from typo corrections,
> 
> 
> A quick scan revealed changes in sections 1.4, 2.1, 5.1, Appendix A, 
> RDFS entailment lemma, Appendix B and the change log in both versions.
> 
> Brian
> 
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 06:34:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 9 December 2014 23:04:05 UTC