Re: no RDF Core telcon this friday, 9Jan, right?

Brian McBride wrote:

> 
> 
> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Brian McBride wrote:
>>
>>> b) advice to the CG about what to do about postponed issues
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Personally I prefer not to discuss postponed issues (for new recs?) 
>> until we've got this one in the bag.
>>
>> As HP rep the position I represented was we did not need to resolve 
>> these issues in this standardization round. For the next few weeks 
>> that remains the position I wish to represent.
> 
> 
> I was not clear.  I was not proposing we discuss resolutions of the 
> issues, but suggestions to the CG of how/whether these issues might, at 
> some point in the future be resolved.  For example, the WG might 
> recommend to the CG that some issues are higher priority than others.
> 
> Is that a discussion you feel able to contribute to?


I am not sure that we can have a procedural only discussion - I guess if I 
am unconfortable I will just stay quiet - and my silence should not be 
interpreted as assent.

For instance, I decided to not reply to Grahams msg on the postponed issues 
despite disagreeing with it.

Jeremy