W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2004

Re: no RDF Core telcon this friday, 9Jan, right?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:33:12 -0600
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1073496792.7156.603.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 11:08, Brian McBride wrote:
> Hmm,
> 
> I was just wondering that myself.
> 
> I see the following possible agenda items for a telecon:
> 
> a) wording changes to the semantics doc
> b) advice to the CG about what to do about postponed issues
> 
> Dan, would you like the WG to meet to discuss/approve the proposed 
> wording changes?

yes.

>   Will the 16th be soon enough?

Good question, but I haven't done the relevant calendar
research to figure it out.

EricM, I leave that to you. Call/page me if you'd like help.

> Eric, is the CG seeking input from the WG about b).
> 
> WG, do folks want to meet to discuss a), b) or anything else?
> 
> I will send a formal notification of a telecon for 16th Jan, but will 
> cancel if its not needed.
> 
> Dan, I hope you have fun on Friday.

Likewise. 1/2 ;-)

> Brian
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> > I've got an opportunity to do some fun family
> > stuff this Friday, so I'd like to know whether
> > it conflicts with an RDF Core telcon.
> > 
> > I haven't seen notice, and we're less than 7
> > days away, so I presume there's no WG telcon this
> > week. Sorry if I missed an announcement to that
> > effect.
> > 
> > If the WG meets, I suppose it'll be somewhat unofficially.
> > In that case, I offer regrets.
> > 
> > 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 12:33:14 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 7 January 2004 12:33:17 EST