W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Media type draft for rdf+xml expiring?

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:42:50 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040224093714.02e6f0c8@127.0.0.1>
To: ajvincent@juno.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Cc: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>

I'm anticipating that Aaron will be submitting a new version real soon now 
with the final RDF document references (if not already done:  I-D 
publications are currently suspended in the run up to the next IETF 
meeting), which we can then request to be formally published and registered 
with IANA.

#g
--

At 02:00 24/02/04 +0000, ajvincent@juno.com wrote:


>I glanced at the RDF primer this afternoon, wondering if the 
>application/rdf+xml media type had been registered.
>
>Apparently, though, the specification referenced by the Primer is not only 
>unofficial (a draft), but expires in mid-March, 2004.  This is not good.
>
>I ask because there's a bug filed for the Mozilla project to support 
>application/rdf+xml instead of the text/rdf media type, which is not 
>approved either.  I'm simply following up, out of curiousity.
>
>Alex Vincent
>Vallejo, CA
>
>________________________________________________________________
>The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
>Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
>Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2004 05:02:59 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tuesday, 24 February 2004 05:03:02 EST