Re: Heads up: RFC2996bis, possible problem for RDF

Pat Hayes wrote:

> 
> I agree with Graham that this is a potentially serious problem that we 
> should nip in the bud. I also would like to be a co-signatory on the 
> proposed textual changes; Graham, please include me. I particularly like 
> the inclusion of the phrase " for purposes of retrieval" as it 
> acknowledges that URIs have other purposes.
> 
> Pat

It's looking like we should make a formal comment as a WG ... what's the 
timescale?

Jeremy