W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: RDF and OWL "REC" documents

From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:44:52 +0000
Message-ID: <16423.47364.34736.145263@merlin.horrocks.net>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Sandro,

I checked it and everything looks good.

Thanks,

Ian


On February 6, Sandro Hawke writes:
> 
> 
> Would all editors please look over their docs and/or diffs and let me
> know ASAP if there's anything terribly wrong with them?  I've done
> various edits to get links to point to the right places (and in a few
> cases as requested) and it's possible I broke something in the
> process.   The cost of changes is very high, but if I broke anything,
> I do want to fix it.
> 
> RDF:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/diffs/20031215-20040210/
> 
> OWL:
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/diffs
>  
> Note that all the links like 
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/staging/$shortname
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-$shortname-20030117
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/TR/STAGE-$shortname
> 
> are fine; they will be rewritten to point to the frozen-in-time TR
> documents as the documents are moved.
> 
>      -- sandro
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 11:49:10 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Monday, 9 February 2004 11:49:13 EST