W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2004

Re: review of RDF Core documents

From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 17:58:06 -0500
Message-ID: <4026BEFE.6000301@acm.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, em@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

That's OK with me.  I have to say, though, that a lot of the email 
traffic having to do with getting the Recs finalized could have been 
eliminated if the Editors (or at least *this* Editor) had been better 
informed as to what was going on.

--Frank

Sandro Hawke wrote:

> ...
> 
>>seemed to be carried over to the other documents as well, and I wondered 
>>whether that was intentional.
>>
> 
> It was.
> 
> There isn't so much "standard boilerplate" as traditions.  When I
> asked about it, I was referred to other recs which followed other
> traditions, so I decided to follow them, too.
> 
>       -- sandro
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 8 February 2004 17:57:17 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sunday, 8 February 2004 17:57:20 EST