W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

RE: Is this really it? (was: I18N response draft3)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:50:37 +0200
To: "Graham Klyne" <gk@ninebynine.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDCEBOCCAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>

> [[
> Why we didn't accept I18N's objection to the design of XML literals
>
> 1. Review status of the WG, noting that we're long overdue, losing
> participation, and that the I18N desideratum for "seamless plain and XML
> literals" was only articulated well after the end of LC1.  This might use
> material from my earlier message [1].

Hmm, while finding much of your msg compelling .. I note that this
requirement "seamless plain and XML literals" is not part of the objection -
so we don't particularly need to justify not addressing this.

More later

Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 30 September 2003 06:52:32 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tuesday, 30 September 2003 06:52:45 EDT