This message [1] crossed in the email with my message [2] on this topic. I think the final section added does overall improve the focus of this draft, though I still harbour the concerns I raised previously. #g -- [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0275.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/att-0275/i18n-part.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0276.html At 11:59 29/09/03 +0300, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >I have updated my draft rationale/rebuttal (attached) > >The main difference is the new final section specifically discussing the >points raised in the formal objection. I have also added section headings >etc, and made some changes to address comments from DaveB. > >I am increasingly unclear what role it will finally play. > >Possibly for 2nd LC it is best to change the intro a bit and attach it to the >issues list, and maybe link to it from the call for review (near the link to >the I18N objection). > >The issue of what role it plays in a call for advance to PR is less pressing. > >Jeremy > > ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.orgReceived on Monday, 29 September 2003 06:26:28 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Monday, 29 September 2003 06:26:45 EDT