> While we were talking, the following document was made public as a formal > objection from I18N to our current design: > http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2003/rdf I think the URL should read http://www.w3.org/2003/09/ri434 (more or less the same content) JeremyReceived on Monday, 29 September 2003 04:12:24 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Monday, 29 September 2003 04:12:36 EDT