W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: defusing objections [was Re: NotAccepted's against semantics]

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:05:26 -0500
Message-Id: <p06001f24bb99f74b1bf4@[10.0.100.25]>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>Two of Peter's objections concern the translation to LBase.  I'm 
>wondering whether we might defuse these objections by replacing the 
>LBase appendix with a suitably worded informative reference to the 
>LBase note, e.g.
>
>[[
>An alternative formulation of the semantics of RDF(S) in the form of 
>axioms for the langauge LBase can be found in the LBase 
>specification [ref to lbase note].
>]]

I will make this change, and move some of the appendix material to 
the Note to suit.

Ready by later today (Friday)

Pat

>Brian
>
>Brian McBride wrote:
>>
>>Peter has clarified [1] the status of some of the comments he has 
>>made on the LC semantics document:
>>
>>pfps-02 - translation to lbase - pfps notes the ball is in our court.
>>
>>pfps-03 - translation to lbase - pfps just doesn't see the need for 
>>lbase in the document
>>
>>pfps-04 - rdf closure rules - pfps wants a stronger notion of 
>>completeness of the closure rules
>>
>>pfps-05 - rdfs closure rules - again pfps wants a stronger notion 
>>of completeness of the the closure rules
>>
>>pfps-06 - xml literals and LV - it is possible the latest docs fix 
>>this and we have not pointed this out to pfps.
>>
>>Brian
>>
>>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0354.html


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 10:07:18 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 26 September 2003 10:07:32 EDT