Peter has clarified [1] the status of some of the comments he has made on the LC semantics document: pfps-02 - translation to lbase - pfps notes the ball is in our court. pfps-03 - translation to lbase - pfps just doesn't see the need for lbase in the document pfps-04 - rdf closure rules - pfps wants a stronger notion of completeness of the closure rules pfps-05 - rdfs closure rules - again pfps wants a stronger notion of completeness of the the closure rules pfps-06 - xml literals and LV - it is possible the latest docs fix this and we have not pointed this out to pfps. Brian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0354.htmlReceived on Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:36:48 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 25 September 2003 12:36:52 EDT