W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought.

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 02:06:14 +0200
To: "Dan Brickley <danbri" <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF71750CD7.DD4AFE57-ONC1256DA5.0083ACB5-C1256DA6.00009533@agfa.be>

I still LOVE that design and along interpretationproperties
I eg can't find anything wrong with the lang issue variation
_:b eg:name _:c.
_:c lang:fi "Ora Yrjö Uolevi Lassila".

Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

                      Dan Brickley                                                                                                      
                      <danbri@w3.org>           To:       pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>                                                    
                      Sent by:                  cc:       w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org                                                         
                      w3c-rdfcore-wg-req        Subject:  Re: I18N Issue alternative: a passing thought.                                
                      2003-09-19 12:45                                                                                                  

* pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> [2003-09-18 17:40-0500]
> Just in case it wasn't clear from my last message, I withdraw the
> suggestion about treating lang tags as property values, and no longer
> think that we should even consider that design.

Thanks for the tour of that corner of design space. I think we know
enough to not go there this side of (hypothetical) RDF 2.0.

Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 20:06:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:08 UTC