- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 09:49:17 +0000
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, "ext Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, Patrick Stic kler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
9: Brian's alternate design writeup: summary of pros/cons See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0099.html and subsequent discussion. If I am absent, please record my objection to Brian's "discussed" design, on the (primary) basis of backwards incompatibility. 12: " 3 "^^xsd:integer / xml schema and whitespace: can this be wrapped up? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0085.html generated a huge amount of traffic. Where are we up to? I would like to officially propose that the WG's last decision, to not fudge and to remove the problemmatic test cases (due to ambiguity in the XML Schema specs) to be upheld and that no changes be made to our design nor no attempt be made by us to interpret/clarify the XML Schema specs. Patrick
Received on Friday, 12 September 2003 02:49:30 UTC