W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > September 2003

Re: I18N Issue alternative: collapsing plain and xml literals

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:43:20 +0100
Message-ID: <3F6035A8.8080302@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Cc: gk@ninebynine.org, danbri@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org



Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> 
> And importantly, for I18N:
> 
>  <rdf:Desription rdf:about="#something" xmlns:ex="http://example.com/"
>    <ex:foo parseType="Literal" xml:lang="en"><b>foo</b></ex:foo>
>  </rdf:Description>
>  
>  gives us
>  
>  <#something> <ex:foo> "<b>foo</b>"@en .
> 
> BUT
> 
>  <rdf:Desription rdf:about="#something" xmlns:ex="http://example.com/"
>    <ex:foo parseType="Literal" xml:lang="en" rdf:datatype="http://example.com/x"><b>foo</b></ex:foo>
>  </rdf:Description>

Is that currently legal syntax?

Brian
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:46:11 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:46:17 EDT