RE: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer

The role of the whitespace facet in the L2V mapping and/or
specification of the lexical space of xsd:integer and similar
datatypes.

I.e. since we can't figure out if " 3 " is or is not a valid
lexical form for xsd:integer, we shouldn't have any test cases
demonstrating its equality or inequality with the value denoted
by "3"^^xsd:integer.

Patrick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 10 September, 2003 12:20
> To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere); Jeremy Carroll; ext Frank Manola
> Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org; pat hayes
> Subject: RE: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer
> 
> 
> 
> %s/in this regard// ?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patrick Stickler [mailto:patrick.stickler@nokia.com]
> > Sent: 10 September 2003 10:44
> > To: Jeremy Carroll; ext Frank Manola
> > Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org; pat hayes
> > Subject: Re: about " 3 "^^xsd:integer
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Can we all just agree that the XML Schema spec
> > is unclear and confusing in this regard, remove all
> > XML Schema test cases touching on this issue, and
> > formally recommend a clarification from the XML 
> > Schema WG (which is unrelated to our own schedule)?
> > 
> 
>